Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Jeff Buckley


10 years ago Jeff Buckley went swimming and never came back. I always wonder, after the succcess of Grace, if he would have gone on to be known as a brilliant song writer or if he would have disappeared, leaving behind a trail broken songs. From the music he did manage to record before his death, it was obvious that he played music "outside the box", but to watch and listen to him sing was to see and hear real emotion and power. Every syllable, every emotion was squeezed out, kicking and screaming and laid bare before the audience.

RIP Jeff Buckley

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Zimbabwe

I have thought about the Australian Cricket tour to Zimbabwe since the Australian Government announced its ban and have come to the conclusion that they have it right. Sadly it is at the expense of my favourite sport (and Johnnie's), but something had to be done. It is patently obvious that the ICC (Ineffectual Cadre of Cretins) have no intention of doing ANYTHING, EVER. They seem to think that the World Cup is over they can sit back an rest until the next one. Then again, maybe their indolence is not such a bad thing when you consider the last actions they took was to sack Darrell Hair for upholding the rules of the game and, coincidentally, reinstate Zimbabwe as a Test playing nation (which way did Zimbabwe vote, I wonder?).

The problems in Zimbabwe go way beyound cricket, this may not even be a blip on the radar there. That any country in this day and age has an average life expectancy of 36 defies belief.

Friday, May 11, 2007

Just say ....sorry what was the question?

This post over at The Age is one of the most reasonable arguments against marijuana use I have seen in a long time. The argument that pot is harmless, as put forth by the older smoker, is based on the misapprehension that the weed today is the same as back in the day. It's not. Its stronger and covered in pesticides and other harmful chemicals. (But what deterrent is that going to be to people who gladly ingest those chemicals in pill form?)

The best argument (and i say best because it has been one that has always haunted me) I have copied from the Age article.

"the truth is marijuana probably isn't gonna make you kill people, and it most likely isn't gonna fund terrorism, but well son, pot makes you feel fine with being bored -- and it's when you're bored that you should be learning some new skill or discovering some new science or being creative. If you smoke pot you may grow up to find out that you aren't good at anything."

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

Look here

My older son is going to be playing indoor cricket for WA at the National Titles in Sydney next month and I'm going along as a sort of diarist/chronicler. I'll be keeping notes here.

Fascism

This article from the Guardian web site by Naomi Wolf argues that there are 10 necessary steps that need to be taken to "destroy constitutional freedoms" and ... well, have a read. It just wears me out thinking about it.

Friday, May 04, 2007

Caption

This site makes me question, and a lot of my bullshit is germinated from there, and I just noticed the catchphrase contest was still going, so I thought I'd chuck this in, because it sums it up for me.

I can kick your arse, or oughta, but I can't make you think.

I didn't say it was good, but it sums it up for me. Hell, I may use it.

Blogs are bad

I remember, when I was younger and more idealistic, thinking that free and open speech was a wonderful idea, because, surely, if everyone knew everyone else's motivation and listened to the reasons behind their actions, this would help spread understanding and love through out the world.
'blogging and online forums have proven me wrong. Well, not completely wrong. Everyones still gets to have there say, but NO ONE LISTENS. There is no understanding, just opportunity to spew forth your opinion (fuck off, i see the irony) with none of the give and take, the listening and understanding that a normal conversation requires. Is it because of the anonymity afforded the writer by their pseudonym? Or that distance removes the physical threat when you behave badly? Or is it the "me" generation, like so many Lleyton Hewitts, growing up believing Mummy and\or Daddy's constant flattery and pandering in their misbegotten attempts to raise their "self esteem"? Am I wrong to blame the medium? Maybe it truly does reflect society and we are all a bunch of whiny, selfish babies.

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

False Idols

Rant starts .....now.

My football team the West Coast Eagles has been in the news quite a lot recently for incidents unrelated to the game. I have tried very hard to avoid the subject but it is getting more and more difficult as the criticism is becoming more and more foolish. The frustrating thing is that the criticism is coming, not only from the "fans", but from the governing body as well. I am not going to pretend that my arguments are un-biased, but I will present them as cogently as possible.

Criticism from the fans

The primary criticism from non-AFL sources is that footballers have a responsibility as role models to children and that Ben Cousins' drug problem is adversely affecting younger fans. As a parent I have taken responsibility for who my sons see as "role models" (I am sick to death of that term). What most people do not seem to realise that success in one "role" does not automatically grant you "model" status across the many roles that we as human beings play. I am more than happy for my boys to aspire to Ben Cousins and Shane Warne's achievements as sportsmen, but would not be happy for them to emulate their personal lives.

Sadly, when I espouse this point of view, the most common argument I receive is that it's "too hard", that "the media" are at fault for sensationalising sportsmen's private lives. Boo Hoo! Who's fault is it that you allow your television to raise your children? Ben Cousins'?? No, it's YOURS and YOURS ALONE. I KNOW raising children can be difficult but so it should be, it the most precious responsibility you can be given and YOU chose to accept it. Football is meant to be entertainment, not footballers lives. That football players take drugs and drink and get into fights does not surprise me and I do not believe that is a very clever lifestyle but NEITHER DO MY CHILDREN. Why? Are they inherently smarter than other children? I don't know. I do know that they have been raised to recognise the difference between the achievements of sports people and their private lives. It is about time you started to teach your kids the same. Not only because I want better lives for your children, but so that my children don't have to put up with people that think like YOU when they grow up.

As you can probably guess, people don't speak to me for long at parties. Hearing that it is your fault when you are looking for someone else to blame makes people uncomfortable. Hopefully, if they are smart enough to listen, it also makes them better people.

Criticism from football

It seems to me that the AFL has accepted the woeful ICC model for adminstering it's sport. Essentially it boils down to "If you make a profit, it doesn't matter about the state of the game or the players". As long as you can convince the fans to show up on the weekend, then you are doing your job properly. Sadly, this is of little practical benefit to the product (i.e. the players) or the consumers (i.e. the fans).
Of course to keep the fans happy, you have to be seen to be doing the "right thing" whether you are or not. For example, require Adam Selwood (who was cleared of any wrongdoing in the incident with Des Headland) to undergo counselling for making derogatory comments about women, while allowing Des Headland (who, oddly was also found not guilty by way of provocation, though nobody was found to have provoked him) to escape unscathed after his violent outburst.

The Eagles finally had enough of Ben Cousins' behaviour. When it became apparent to them that the cause of the erratic behaviour may have been substance related, they did their best to see him rehabilitated. Their motivation may not have been completely altruistic, but they were attempting to address the problem. This week Jeff Farmer, currently serving a 6 week suspension for violent behaviour, was arrested and charged with assault. Fremantle's response was to suspend him immediately until round 13 and then summon him before the board. The news media is full of speculation about Farmer's future and some self-congratulatory back slapping by Club President, Rick Hart. Their actions may have been "swift and decisive" but will they go any way toward helping Jeff Farmer with his anger problems? I don't think so. Instead of trying to assist a player (product) who has brought thousands of fans (consumers) through their gates, Hart has donned his Pontius Pilate hat (wreath?) and washed his hands of Farmer.

Guess which of these scenarios was sanctioned by the AFL commission? Or how many Fremantle executives were called before Andrew Demetriou?

Sadly it appears that sport is mirroring society again in as much as the "rehabilation vs retribution" argument is swinging firmly toward retribution.